billbahai asked:


How can this be fair? Last week in Toronto, Ontario, the Superior Court ruled that a divorced man must continue to provide financial support to a child which he did not father, on the grounds that he did not question the parentage on a sufficiently timely basis. Two years ago the Supreme Court in Arkansas court did essentially the same thing - the man did not question paternity at the time of divorce. Only a few states, as far as my research could identify, have laws freeing men from financial support if they prove they are not the father years after birth.

My opinion: These rulings appear to confuse parenting with financial support. The people who provide the biological contributions to make a child should be on the hook for financial support. The person identified to be the father should be the one in the best interests of the child, normally the one who has been providing the parenting.

And if the mother has deceived the parenting father she should be liable to the penalities for fraud.

Opinions?

Citations:

A Toronto-area man must continue paying child support to his former wife despite DNA tests proving he is not the biological father of her 16-year-old twins, an Ontario Superior Court judge has ruled.
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=1152816

“The Arkansas Supreme Court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring an Ashley County man to pay child support for a child he didn’t father, because he didn’t contest the paternity in his divorce decree.

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/05/18/arkansas-supreme-court-rules-man-must-continue-to-pay-child-support-for-child-who-isnt-his/
Remi, thank you for the comments - makes some of this more understandable, but the injustice no less. Again, financial support should be the obligation of those who biologically create the child; enforcing fraudulent responsibility is tyrannical and unjust.

Neil

posterlala asked:


I was seeing a guy and I was upset with him about something, I hanged up the phone on him but we never had a fight. Later that night either him or he’s cousin messaged me from a yahoo id. I know it either him or he’s cousin because he’s cousin asked me to add him months back but I didn‘t, but they thought I probably forgot about that id. When I got a message from a person using that id, they start to lie about where they are from etc etc, pretending to be someone else. So I got really upset and reveal that I know who they are and I was really very rude to them. Because I was 18 and they were both 26 and I thought it was a bit immature for them to be playing games like this.

And i am not sure if it was because i had argument with him/or he’s cousin on that id why the complications began. We did not contact each other after the argument with the person on that id. Months later I called him and he says he was busy at work and said he would call me back, but he never did. So I said to myself I’d forget him but the….

He started calling my phone in the nights and just listening to my voice and not saying anything. I knew it was him because only he has that number.

However months later I called him to apologize even though it was not necessarily my fault. And he says he does not wanna speak with me anymore and I am not sure if it is because I hanged up on him or because or how I reacted to that person on that id, he is very family oriented to if it was he’s cousin and not him, he’d probably be upset that I behaved like that to he’s cousin. But can you blame me when he message me and be a fraud.

When i asked him why he does not wanna talk with me anymore he says because me and him had a fight. But the thing is that i never had a fight with him - the fight was between me and he’s cousin unless it was him using he‘s cousin id. He’s cousin( the person using that id) got fresh with me so i told him off - maybe he‘s cousin went and told him something or maybe he got offended because of how I acted when they were messing around with me on that id.
Whatever it is both of them knew how I reacted, since he’s cousin probably let him use the id if it was him and not he’s cousin.

Anyway he told me that I should never contact him again and that he wants nothing to do with me.

My dad had seen him earlier in the day and gave him my number- he told my dad he would call but didn‘t. Anyway when was with him on the phone he asked for my number again and said I should not call him and that he will call me. But then he says he never wants to speak with me again. Then he asked if I was crying I told him no, he says he does not wanna speak with me if I am crying, and we can talk some other time when I feel better. Then he says I should never call him or send him email or anything. It’s been a couple months now and he still haven’t called.

Does it sound as if he will contact me?

Next question, do u think I have rights to get angry when they message me using different id’s and lying to me about who they are etc.

What does this mix signal mean?
hope i didn’t confuse u
Also i knew he’s cousin through him.

Corey

The Truth asked:


She goes by Tosin and will tell you she is an accountant for Optimum Limited Nigeria … She will try to get you to wire her money through Western Union for cell phones, etc. and passport agengy fees to come visit you. She is actually part of a small group or is working for herself trying to get you to open up bank accounts (Wells Fargo and Bank of America in the US) to have money for her employer to deposit it into and then you wire it immediately to her…This is Fraud and carries prison time if you get caught. She sends you pics of a beautiful black woman and says she wants to marry to get out of Nigeria (hopefully a white man because see has seen how they treat their wives). Don’t fall into her trap, the money you send her up front you will not see again, she won’t use it for what she tells you it is for. When you ask her about coming to visit her instead she id very oppositional about it. When you ask her about buying her tickets, it can only be done in Nigeria, its the law there

EDWARDO